Question 01
More analysis versus better decisions
When portfolio-scale output creates genuine leverage—and when it simply gives both sides more material to dispute.
Joint webinar · ClaimsEvidence × GreyB
AI is changing SEP analysis. Is it changing who wins?
On 3 September, we’re joining GreyB for a candid discussion about what happens when licensors and implementers can both generate portfolio-wide patent analysis—and why producing more output does not necessarily produce better decisions.
The real question is no longer whether AI can generate an analysis. It is whether the resulting evidence can withstand expert scrutiny, influence a negotiation and remain defensible if the dispute escalates.
View programme and registerOn-demand replay included
Event details
Thursday, 3 September 2026
Free online event
12:00–1:00 PM ET
18:00–19:00 CEST
Licensing and litigation perspectives
Live audience discussion
Replay sent to registrants
Why we’re joining
More output is not the same as better evidence.
AI is making independent SEP analysis economically viable at a scale that was previously inaccessible to many implementers. That is an important shift—but access to more analysis is not the same as access to reliable evidence.
Our interest is in the point where automated output becomes decision-grade: traceable to the patent and standard, tested for both false positives and false negatives, and reviewed by professionals who understand how the evidence may be challenged.
What we want to examine
Where does AI create leverage—and where does it create new friction?
Question 02
The asymmetric cost of errors
Why false positives and false negatives do not carry the same cost for licensors, implementers and their advisers.
Question 03
What makes evidence decision-grade
The traceability, review and professional judgment needed before an AI-assisted analysis can support a real decision.
Question 04
Where the advantage moves next
What differentiates a licensing position once generating an initial patent analysis is no longer the difficult part.
Speakers
The patent and AI perspectives we’re bringing to the discussion.
Co-Founder & CPO, ClaimsEvidence
Christoph Hewel
European and German Patent Attorney · UPC Representative
Co-Founder & CEO, ClaimsEvidence
Konstantinos Poulinakis
AI Systems and Patent Analytics
Group Manager, GreyB
Aman Kumar
5G and 6G Innovation Strategy
Sales Manager, GreyB
Dhruva Sood
Patent Strategy and Monetization
Join the discussion
Join the conversation about what makes AI-assisted evidence decision-grade.
GreyB hosts the registration.
View programme and register